![]() |
| Ryan Hunter-Reay waits on bump day for the Indy 500. (Photo: Getty/Daylife) |
That evening, rumors began to fly that A.J. Foyt and Michael Andretti were working on a swap that would put Hunter-Reay into the Indy 500, taking the ride of A.J. Foyt's driver Bruno Junqueira.
Unfortunately for Hunter-Reay, he is left as the face of this ugly business side of pure, loser-goes-home style of racing.
It's left IndyCar fans complaining that Hunter-Reay is missing the race, and mentioned the fact that nearly two of IndyCar's biggest American stars nearly missed the race because of the rain. It's been the mark of sarcastic humor as the FakeBrianFrance twitter account made fun of IndyCar stealing one more thing from NASCAR. But is it right or should IndyCar adopt a provisional style of qualifying?
In my opinion, the Indy 500 has it right. Nobody should be locked in and the fastest 33 should always race. Now if teams want to trade drivers and buy rides, I am perfectly okay with that. That still creates a penalty for the team missing the race rather than just being able to lock themselves in without a second thought. It creates urgency and maybe, just maybe a team won't want to deal and it will result in a top flight driver missing the race.
Is it unfair? Not at all. Do we go into baseball season saying the defending World Series champion gets an automatic playoff berth? Do we do that in football, hockey, or basketball? This is a concept that sports is very familiar with. If you aren't good enough, you miss the show and you don't get to play. In fact, NASCAR is the only major sport in the world, that I know of, that guarantees their top teams an attempt to compete for a championship.
I actually wish NASCAR and the Daytona 500 would actually take IndyCar's lead on this and remove provisionals and "locked in" positions by owners points for the biggest race of NASCAR's calendar. There are enough chances to get into the Daytona 500 through pole qualifying, the Duel qualifying race, and you could even have a second round of qualifying as they used to have. It's the biggest race, the 43 fastest teams should make the race. It puts the focus and increases the drama and it's not a gimmicked drama, either. It also reduces confusion between "locked in" and "not locked in" drivers during the qualifying races.
It requires the top teams to be on their A-game or they go home. I have zero issues with it, but if a team wants to go buy a ride for one of their sponsored drivers to gain exposure for their company, they can.
Let racing figure out who qualifies for the race, let business figure out who actually races. If a company can't deal with the potential of their driver not racing, in a sport where everything should depend on how fast you can go, maybe they need to consider spending their advertising dollars somewhere else.


